|
RE-ENTERING
THE RING
In 1998, Japanese
director Hideo Nakata's original "Ringu" brought J-horror, or
Japanese horror-a distinct style of scary movies that rely more on story
and character than on special effects and gore-into the forefront of Asian
cinema and pop culture. Based on the Ringu series of novels by Japanese
horror writer Koji Suzuki, Nakata's "Ringu" became the highest
grossing film in Japanese cinema history and spawned two sequels, one
of which, "Ringu 2," was also directed by Nakata.
Following
the international success of "Ringu," Walter F. Parkes and Laurie
MacDonald produced the American version, "The Ring," starring
Naomi Watts in the story of a cursed videotape that doomed anyone who
watched it to a terrible death in exactly seven days. Opening in fall
2002, the film quickly emerged as a huge sleeper hit, as Americans nationwide
discovered the phenomenon that had been sweeping through Asia.
Walter F. Parkes, who again teamed with Laurie MacDonald to produce "The
Ring Two," offers, "In recent years, horror has become the domain
of slasher movies, but there was a time when horror was really mainstream
in Hollywood, when some of the best directors, writers and actors contributed
to the genre through movies like 'The Exorcist,' 'The Omen' and 'Rosemary's
Baby.' Our intention with 'The Ring' was to try to elevate the genre again.
Okay, so fade out-the movie is a bigger hit than even we expected it to
be, which gave us the opportunity to continue the myth
to tell the
next story. Our main goal with the sequel was to give it the legitimacy
that the first movie had."
To achieve that legitimacy, Parkes and MacDonald set out to reassemble
the main talent behind "The Ring's" success. Screenwriter Ehren
Kruger was brought back to pen the sequel, which also reunited three of
the executive producers, Mike Macari, Roy Lee and Michele Weisler. Perhaps
most importantly, Naomi Watts, who played Rachel Keller, and young David
Dorfman, who had portrayed her son Aidan, were set to reprise their roles.
"I don't think we could have had the first 'Ring' without Naomi,
and we certainly couldn't have done the second one," Parkes attests.
"After more than two years, she picked up the new script and she
was immediately this character-this kind of slightly haunted, at times
aggressive, vulnerable and yet strong person, who is Rachel. It's something
to see."
Watts acknowledges, "A sequel is a scary thing to enter into because
of the comparisons to the first one, which did so well and really resonated
within the genre. We want it to deliver and give the audience what they're
looking for, but you don't want to repeat the same story. The upside is
that you get to carry on with a role that you loved playing the first
time around and explore the evolution of the character. So there are a
lot of reasons why it's challenging and also quite fun, I think."
Director Gore Verbinski, who had helmed the first film, was unavailable
to return for the sequel, but made his own recommendation for its director.
"It was a little bit of kismet," says MacDonald. "When
Gore was unavailable, we asked him who he thought should direct this film
and he suggested Hideo. We all thought it was a great idea, but Hideo
was attached to another movie and was also unavailable. We initially went
with an extremely talented first-time director, but things ultimately
did not work out. Then Hideo's other movie did not come together and he
suddenly became available, so I believe it was meant to be somehow."
Parkes notes, "Hideo was someone who could approach this film, not
as an assignment or a job, but rather as a continuation of something very
real to him. This was the man who literally created the mythology we are
trying to explore."
"Clearly Hideo's original movie was so powerful. Although it was
made on a small budget, it had a big vision and a specific sensibility
and tone that really informed our movie, so it was exciting to have him
direct 'The Ring Two,'" MacDonald states, adding, "It was also
very reassuring to Naomi Watts, who loved the original 'Ringu.'"
Watts affirms, "Hideo is an incredible director of the genre. I had
seen 'Ringu' as well as his film 'Dark Water,' so I had a huge amount
of faith in him already. He understands the visual side of storytelling
and knows about pacing; he knows how and when to reveal things and when
it's better to take your time revealing them. When Hideo came onto the
project, it made perfect sense
like it came full circle."
With "Ringu," as well as others of his films, Nakata has established
a reputation for his artful ability to subtly conjure up scares, focusing
on themes of revenge and evil and overflowing with a sense of dread. In
fact, in Time Magazine's special April 26, 2004 issue on the "100
Most Influential People in the World," Nakata was named in the Artists
& Entertainers category for his influential body of Asian ghost movies.
In "The Ring Two," the director has incorporated many of the
storytelling techniques and recurring themes established in his earlier
work: single mothers, orphaned children, vengeful spirits, water, and
the effects of technology on society. In Nakata's oeuvre, the banal, routine
rituals of daily life-the ringing of a phone, the turning of a faucet-are
imbued with spine-chilling suspense and trepidation. Normalcy becomes
terror.
Ehren Kruger remarks, "What's interesting about this movie and the
first 'Ring' is a lot of our inspirations came from Hideo's inventions
in the Japanese films. Now here he is bringing new inventions to a phenomenon
he created several years ago. Hideo definitely brought a lot of his own
lore and mythology to the supernatural aspects of the story that, in several
cases, we hadn't considered. It was a tremendous advantage to work with
a director who innately understood the material from having spent so many
years thinking about the same themes and issues. Even in the first film,
his was really the artistic vision we were trying to honor long before
he knew this mythology would come back into his life."
Nakata says that it was Kruger's script that first convinced him to return
to the well, so to speak. "When I first read the draft of 'The Ring
Two,' I thought it was very interesting and also very different from my
'Ringu 2.' I thought it was powerful and intriguing and would allow me
to explore a story that was different from the originals and from the
first 'Ring' movie."
"The challenge of any sequel is to find the reason for being
to
find a story with its own merits as an interesting tale," Kruger
states. "It was a challenge to find an organic way to continue the
story of Rachel Keller and her son Aidan and to find a reason for Samara,
the villain antagonist of the piece, to seek them out and wreak havoc
in their lives one more time."
"There is a primary difference between the two films," says
MacDonald. "The first 'Ring' was told in images. The tape was not
only the scary thing that threatened to kill you, but also held the visual
clues for Rachel to unravel the mystery. It gave us a very obvious map
and you literally followed those images through the movie. The story here
is more grounded in emotion and has deeper character issues. I think it
feels connected to the first, but expands on those aspects."
|